NUPL files motion to halt implementation of Anti-Terrorism Act
Aileen Cerrudo • October 28, 2020 • 368
The National Union of People’s Lawyers (NUPL) has filed a motion with the Supreme Court (SC) to halt the implementation of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020.
The lawyers’ group believes the implementing rules and regulations (IRR) of the Anti-Terrorism Law did not clarify the reported unconstitutional provisions included in the said law. The group filed an omnibus motion requesting for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against the law’s implementation.
NUPL Secretary General Ephraim Cortez said it worsened after more provisions were added which violates human rights. These include the red-tagging of various personalities including Liza Soberano, Angel Locsin, and Catriona Gray.
“Ito iyong nakita naming remedyo upang temporarily huwag muna ma-implement itong IRR at hoping may result din ano sa paghupa ng red-tagging na nangyayari (This is a remedy to temporarily suspend the implementation of the IRR, and we hope this would result in the decrease of the current red-tagging),” he said.
Cortez also added that the Anti-Terrorism Law gives Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) Southern Luzon Command chief Lt. Gen. Antonio Parlade Jr. the confidence to red-tag celebrities which drew criticisms from several netizens.
“Nalalagyan niya ng legal basis iyong kanilang ginagawa ito ang sinasabi natin from the very beginning in our opposition to the passage of this law binibigyan niya ngayon ng justification ang mga red-taggers tulad ni Parlade to do it, (Parlade was able to have a legal basis to do this [red tagging]. This is what we have been saying from the very beginning of our opposition to the passage of this law. [The law] is giving justification for red-taggers like Parlade to do it),” Cortez said.
Meanwhile, the oral arguments for the petitions filed at the Supreme Court is set to begin in mid-November, according to SC Chief Diosdado Peralta. He said the oral arguments was supposed to begin in September but it was delayed due to the number of petitions filed against the said law.
“When we’ll go back to the session on November 3, I hope, I hope she will be ready to submit to us the issues to be argued and set the preliminary conference,” he said. AAC (with reports from Dante Amento)
MANILA, Philippines — The oral arguments on petitions questioning the legality of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 will resume on April 27, the Supreme Court (SC) said.
In an advisory, the SC said the next oral arguments would be held via videoconferencing “given the current public health situation.”
“Oral arguments shall resume on April 27, 2021, at 2:30 p.m. which, per prior order, is two weeks after the lifting of enhanced community quarantine in the National Capital Judicial Region,” the SC said.
“This arrangement shall be pro hac vice [for this occasion only] vis-à-vis these consolidated cases. Personal appearance before the Court En Banc remains to e the primary mode of conducting oral arguments,” it added.
The proceedings will be streamed online but will only be limited to an audio feed, the high court said.
The oral arguments on the 37 petitions lodged against the measure were put on hold since last month due to the spike of infections and other COVID-19 concerns.
MANILA, Philippines—Several lawyers’ groups are appealing for immediate action from the Supreme Court (SC) to stop the rising violence against lawyers.
The National Union of People’s Lawyers (NUPL) and the Integrated Bar of the Philippines(IBP) have raised concerns over the increasing number lawyer killings in the country.
According to the NUPL, 54 layers have been killed since 2016. The most recent attack was against human rights lawyer Atty. Angelo Karlo Guillen who was stabbed in Iloilo City on Wednesday (March 3).
IBP President Atty. Egon Cayosa said the SC should call on the national government to address crimes committed against lawyers.
“Panawagan namin na atasan naman ang mga huwes at ang DOJ (Department of Justice) naman ang mga fiscal na bilis bilisan i-prioritize naman iyong kaso ng mga abogado, he said.
Several lawyers also slammed President Rodrigo Duterte for his seeming lack of response to the attacks on his fellow lawyers.
“Ayaw natin na ang response is after the fact na mayroon nang pinatay mayroon nang in-attack na abogado at tsaka lamang may gagawin ang ating Korte Suprema. I think ang mahalaga ay prevention ng mga attacks na ito,” said human rights lawyer, Atty. Evalyn Ursua. AAC (with reports from Dante Amento)
MANILA, Philippines – May limitasyon ang pagsasagawa ng warrantless arrest sa ilalim ng mga panuntunan ng bagong Anti-Terrorism Act, ayon sa Anti-Terrorism Council (ATC).
Sinabi ni ATC spokesperson, Undersecretary Adrian Sugay na sa ilalim ng implementing rules and regulations (IRR) ng batas, hindi maaaring gamiting batayan ang “mere suspicion” o hinala lamang sa pag-aresto ng walang kaukulang warrant of arrest .
Ayon kay Sugay, nakasaad sa IRR na dapat may probable cause o matibay na batayan upang mang-aresto ang mga otoridad.
Posible lang din aniya ito kung ang isang indibidwal ay nahuli sa aktong gumagawa ng krimen o kaya may “hot pursuit” o kaya ay tumakas ito sa bilangguan.
“Ang posisyon namin d’yan the way we interpret, is that it should be interpreted in relation to Rule 113 of the warrantless arrest. It can be reasonably interpreted that any arrest based on section 29 is has to be based on probable cause,” ang wika ni Sugay.
Nakasaad rin aniya sa IRR na obligadong magsumite ng affidavit sa ATC ang mga law enforcer upang makakuha ng pahintulot bago isagawa ang pag-aresto sa anomang suspek.
Sa ilalim ng batas, maaaring idetine ng dalawang linggo hanggang 24 na araw ang isang naarestong indibidwal.
Sa kabila ng ginawang pagtitiyak ng ATC, plano naman ng Bayan Muna Party-list na maghain ng petisyon sa Korte Supreme upang kwestuyunin ang nilalaman ng IRR para sa Anti-Terrorism Act.
Hihilingin din nila sa korte na maglabas ng temporary restraining order (TRO) para itigil ang pagpapatupad ng batas.
“Pag-aaralan ng makabayan bloc especially inilabas na itong IRR kung magsasampa ng petisyon to nullify and declare unconstutional itong IRR or just a supplemental petition,” ang pahayag ni Bayan Muna Party-list Rep. Carlos Zarate.
Sa ngayon ay aabot na sa 37 petisyon ang naka-hain sa Korte Supreme laban sa kontrobersiyal na batas. – RRD (mula sa ulat ni Correspondent Dante Amento)
UNTV is a major TV broadcast network with 24-hour programming. An Ultra High Frequency station with strong brand content that appeal to everyone, UNTV is one of the most trusted and successful Philippine networks that guarantees wholesome and quality viewing experience.